Friedmann Equation#

The Friedmann equation applies the Friedmann metric,

ds2=dt2+a(t)2[dr2+Sk(r)2dΩ2]

to Einstein’s field equation,

Gμν=8πGc4Tμν

The resultant is an equation that describes how the Hubble parameter varies over time H2(t). You may interpret this as how the universe expands over time. The Friedmann equation is an implicit function of time more explicitly it depends on the energy density ρ of the universe.

Often times, we use the definition of the Hubble’s parameter,

H(t)a˙a

Mass Density Form :

(a˙a)2=4πG3(ρ+3ρc2)+Λc23

Energy Density Form : $(a˙a)2=8πG3c2μκc2R02a2$

Natural Unit Form : $(a˙a)2=8πG3μka2$

  • μ : Energy density of the universe

  • k : Curvature constant where kκ/R02

We will be using the natural unit form since it’s natural.

Hubble’s Constant#

Immediately one can infer the Hubble’s constant from the Friedmann equation setting t=t0 which is today.

(a˙0a0)2=H02H02=8πG3μ0ka2

Non-Relativistic Form#

The Friedmann equation can be thought of as an expanding finite sphere of mass density ρ(t)

(a˙a)2=8πG3ρ(t)+2Crs21a(t)2
  • C : Constant that affects the expansion rate

  • rs co-moving radius

Proof#

Density Parameter Form#

(a˙a)2=H02[Ωr,0a4+Ωm,0a4+ΩΛ,0+1Ω0a2]

Fluid Equation#

The fluid equation is the equation of motion for the energy density ρ as a function of time. It is given by an adiabatic expansion of the universe.,

μ˙+3a˙a(μ+P)=0μ˙=3a˙a(μ+P)μ˙aa˙=3(μ+P)

Proof - Newtonian#

You may prove exactly, the fluid equation for the adiabatic expansion of a sphere with total internal energy E=V(t)μ(t) where V(t) is,

V(t)=4π3rs3a(t)3

Acceleration Equation#

Knowing the Friedmann equation and fluid equation we can take the derivative to get,

a¨a=4πG3c2(μ+3P)

The condition of acceleration is to make μ+3P<0 so P<13μ. Unfortunately we do not know how P relates to μ which both share the same units.

Equation of State#

We assume that pressure P and energy density μ are linearly proportional such that,

P=wμw={0matter1/3radiation1dark energy
  • w : A constant relating to the type of energy. Notice that from the acceleration equation, the universe accelerates for w<1/3 so it motivates that the unknown energy (dark energy) is negative. Why we use exactly w=1 for dark energy is explained in the cosmological constant

For a universe of several energy components, μ is a weighted sum of those energies,

P=iwiμi

Now let’s apply each type of energy density to the fluid equation:

μ˙i+3a˙a(μi+Pi)=0dμiμi=3(1+wi)daa
μi(a)=μi,0a3(1+wi)

This gives the useful proportional relations,

μma3μra4μΛ=μΛ,0

Cosmological Constant - Incorrect Version#

The cosmological constant Λ started out as a correction to Einstein’s field equation for a universe full of matter and radiation. In Einstein’s years, scientist did not believe that the universe was either expanding or contracting thus conclude that a universe of matter and radiation must be a stable universe. Unfortunately, Einstein equation does not agree so Einstein added the cosmological constant such that the Friedmann equation changes to:

(a˙a)2=8πG3μka2+λ3

The acceleration equation is then,

a¨a=4πG3(μ+3P)+Λ3

Notice that at a stable universe where a¨(t)=0, when P=0μ+13μ and

Λ4πGμμΛ18πGΛ
  • μΛ : Cosmological constant component of energy density (note: μμΛ), independent of time.

Let’s plug in Λ into the Friedmann equation for a static universe a˙=0 and a=1,

2Λ3ka2+Λ3k=Λ

Since Λ>0, this indicates that the curvature k>0 therefore a open but static universe. This sounds incorrect and it is; in the next section we will explore the more acceptable use of the cosmological constant.

Motivation on the Incorrectness : Consider even a slight increase in Λ then a˙>0 which causes μm0 and by the Friedmann equation this feedbacks to a˙0 even more. We got a non-linear expanding universe

Cosmological Constant - Vacuum Energy#

The most accepted “correct” way to interpret the cosmological constant is as vacuum energy. Yes, vacuum has energy which many may first have been introduced as the Heinsenberg uncertainty principle,

ΔEΔth